By KPC Reporter
Shabana FC began their 2025/26 Kenyan Premier League season with a strong 4–2 victory over APS Bomet at Gusii Stadium, a result that sparked celebration among fans and optimism for the campaign ahead.
However, the club’s promising start was quickly overshadowed by a troubling incident involving a group of supporters and allegations of counterfeit merchandise.
Videos circulating on social media show a tense confrontation in which several Shabana fans accused others of wearing fake team jerseys.
In the footage, some individuals were pressured to remove their shirts, while others stood by in similar attire.
Ultimately, a number of the disputed jerseys were thrown into small fires and burned.
The act, carried out by a few individuals, has drawn widespread condemnation, with many calling it unnecessary, humiliating, and harmful to the club’s image.
One fan, Capelo Andrew Osuro Amba, shared his experience on Facebook, explaining that he could not afford the official jersey priced at Ksh 1,800–2,000 and instead bought a cheaper version for Ksh 500.
He recounted being confronted by muscular men who forced him to remove his shirt, leaving him to return home without clothing.
Another supporter, James Ogaya Sudhe, criticized the incident, noting that generic alternatives exist in many industries—including medicine—to accommodate different financial backgrounds.
He warned that such actions could alienate fans and damage the club’s reputation.
Beyond the moral outrage, the incident raises serious legal and ethical questions.
Kenyan law recognizes the property rights of individuals, even if the item in question is counterfeit.
Once purchased, the jersey becomes the buyer’s personal property, and neither the club nor its supporters have the legal authority to confiscate or destroy it without consent or a court order.
Forcibly stripping individuals and burning their belongings could expose perpetrators to civil claims, including assault, property damage, and public nuisance.
Moreover, public burning of items poses health and safety risks and may violate environmental regulations.
Agencies such as the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) could be compelled to investigate, especially given the availability of video evidence that clearly identifies those involved.
As the debate continues, many are urging Shabana FC and its fan base to adopt a more respectful and constructive approach.
Rather than resorting to intimidation or public shaming, the club could focus on education, awareness campaigns, and incentives to encourage the purchase of official merchandise.
Balancing pride in the team with respect for individual rights and community values will be essential if Shabana FC hopes to maintain its growing support and avoid further controversy.