How Senators Saved Governor Nyaribo

Nyamira Governor Amos Nyaribo.

By Ng’wono Bw’Otwere

Nyamira Governor Amos Nyaribo has once again outmaneuvered his political rivals after the Senate threw out the latest impeachment attempt against him.

The Senate ruled that the County Assembly failed to meet the basic constitutional threshold required to send a governor home.

The dramatic conclusion followed a tense first day of Senate hearings marked by sharp legal arguments and a spirited defence from Nyaribo’s team, who insisted that the Assembly’s vote was not only flawed but “arithmetically defective.”

According to the governor’s lawyers, Nyamira MCAs needed at least 24 votes to sustain the motion.

They managed 23.

That single missing vote became the centre of the storm, with the defence arguing that allowing a trial to proceed based on a faulty number would amount to violating due process and setting a dangerous precedent for county politics.

Senators spent hours dissecting the issue, and when Senate Speaker Amason Kingi finally put the matter to a vote, the outcome was overwhelming: 38 senators agreed with the governor’s objection and only four disagreed.

The decision ended the impeachment bid instantly, sparing Nyaribo a full trial and jolting Nyamira’s political class.

Analysts believe the ruling will ease tensions in a county already shaken by heated debates and widening rifts among leaders.

They also note that the Senate used the moment to send a blunt message to county assemblies countrywide: impeachment is a powerful tool, but it must be used with diligence, precision, and strict adherence to the law.

For Nyaribo, surviving a third attempt is a major political victory and a chance to reset relations with the Assembly, whose actions have repeatedly threatened to derail county governance.

He is expected to resume full duties immediately, though any future bid to remove him would have to start afresh at the Assembly—and follow the Constitution to the letter.

The ruling has also strengthened the Senate’s role as a constitutional guardrail, drawing a clear line against unlawful or hurried impeachment attempts that have become increasingly common in devolved politics.

Scroll to Top